Adaptive Medicine 8(3): |
119 |
DOI: 10.4247/AM.2016.ABG147 |
|
Original Article
Protective Effects of a Novel Panax Ginseng and Salvia Miltiorrhiza Mixture on
1Department of Sports Sciences, University of Taipei, Taipei 11153, Taiwan, Republic of China
2Protein Phosphorylation Unit, de Duve Institute, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Brussels 1200, Belgium 3Athletic Department, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan, Republic of China
4Department of Exercise and Health Science, University of Taipei, Taipei 11153, Taiwan, Republic of China
5Department of Physical Therapy, Chang Gung University, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City 33302, Taiwan, Republic of China
6Department of Exercise and Health Science, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei 11219, Taiwan, Republic of China, and
7Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei 10507, Taiwan, Republic of China
The purpose of this study was to determine whether a novel mixture consisting of Panax ginseng (PG) and Salvia miltiorrhiza bunge (SM) could attenuate the deleterious effects of lipopolysaccharides (LPS) on myocardial function.
Key Words: danshen, endotoxin, ginseng,
Introduction
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a glycolipid endo- toxin found in the outer membrane of
Corresponding author:
Health Sciences, No. 365,
†Tsai,
Received: May 10, 2016; Revised: July 22, 2016; Accepted: July 25, 2016.
©2016 by The Society of Adaptive Science in Taiwan and Airiti Press Inc. ISSN :
120 |
Tsai, Chuang, Lin, Chen, Chen and Liao |
(3, 13). The excess protein oxidation and cell mem- brane impairment may take place in cardiomyocyte in response to oxidative challenge (43), and protein turnover subsequently increases (13). The inducible effects of LPS on inflammation initiates a sequence of cellular events (e.g. elevating oxidative stress, impairing sarcolemmal integrity, and myofibrillar damage in cardiomyocytes) that result in decreased myocardial contractile efficiency and left ventricular dysfunction (2, 22, 24).
Panax ginseng (ginseng) and Salvia miltiorrhiza bunge (danshen) are very popular herbal medicine in Asian and oriental countries (10, 30). In Chinese medicine, Panax ginseng is a common booster for alleviating phys- ical strength, improving blood circulation, accelerating recovery, and delaying the occurrence of fatigue (36). Panax ginseng consists of several primary ginse- nosides (e.g. Rg1, Rb1, and Rd), which predomi- nantly account for its pharmacological effects (35). Rb1, a primary constitute in the Panax ginseng, is capable of suppressing
Salvia miltiorrhiza bunge is a generally used herb for the treatment of cardiovascular disease and hy- pertension (41). The major pharmacological compo- nents of Salvia miltiorrhiza bunge root are tanshinone IIA and salvianolic acid B (25). More recently, Salvia miltiorrhiza aqueous extract has been demonstrated to attenuate oxidative stress and myocardial
In light of the distinct benefits of Panax ginseng and Salvia miltiorrhiza bunge on attenuating cell damage or quenching inflammation, it raises a possibility that the combination of these two herbs possibly produces better benefits than along. Therefore, we hypothesized that
mixture consisting of Panax ginseng and Salvia miltio- rrhiza bungecould attenuate the deleterious effects of LPS on inducing myocardial dysfunction and circu- lating
Materials and Methods
Plant Extract and Chemicals
All the chemicals used in this study were obtained from
Animal Care and Maintenance
Experimental Design and Treatment
0.5mg LPS/kg; n = 8), and [3] a GD mixture (PG: 150 mg/kg; SM: 150 mg/kg; total dose: 300 mg/kg for a week; 0.5 mg LPS/kg; n = 8) with LPS challenge (GD+ LPS; n = 8). After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cardioprotective Effects of Ginseng and Danshen Mixture |
|
|
|
|
121 |
|||||||||||||||
A 0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
AU |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rg1 Re |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rb1 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
10.00 |
|
20.00 |
30.00 |
40.00 |
50.00 |
60.00 |
70.00 |
80.00 |
90.00 |
100.00 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
B 0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minutes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AU |
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
acid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
llA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salvianolia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanshinone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
10.00 |
|
|
20.00 |
30.00 |
|
|
40.00 |
|
50.00 |
60.00 |
|
70.00 |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minutes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 1. HPLC analyze results of Panax ginseng. (A) and Salvia miltiorrhiza (B). The major ginsenoside components of Panax gin- seng are Rg1, Re, Rb. Salvia miltiorrhiza was rich in Salvianolia acid B and Tanshinone IIA.
LPS injection. Immediately after 4 h blood sample col- lection, we dissected them to collect heart tissues (left ventricle).
Echocardiography
All rats received echocardiography measurements at baseline and 3.5 h after LPS or vehicle injection. Any extra disturbance, which caused higher physiological pressure, was avoided during the process. Before each measurement, rats were sedated with pentobarbital (50 mg/kg). Then, we shaved the thorax of rats and placed them in supine position for measuring with multipurpose ultrasound system platform (Acuson Sequoia C512, SIEMENS, Munich, Germany). In short, in
Serum Levels of
Whole blood samples were collected into tubes containing ETDA and then centrifuged at 3000 ⋅ g for 10 min. The supernatant was used to measure for
122 |
Tsai, Chuang, Lin, Chen, Chen and Liao |
absorbance.
Protein Assay and Western Blotting
Left ventricle tissue was weighed for 50 mg and homoge- nized with 400 ∝l Radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer consisting of 150 mM NaCl, 1.0%
Statistical Analysis
All data obtained from present study was analyzed by statistical product and service solutions (SPSS) statistical software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) for all statistical analyzes and shown as mean ± SE. The percentage change between baseline and different
as [(value at different
Results
Food Intake and Body Weight
The average body weight at baseline was 157.3 ± 7.0 g. On the experiment day, the body weight of Control, LPS, and GD+LPS groups were 237.4 ± 8.5 g, 235.4 ±
4.0g, and 235.8 ± 4.2 g, respectively. Supplementation of purified mix herbs did not alter food intake. The av- erage daily food intake of Control, LPS, and GD+LPS groups during the supplementation periods were 32.0 ± 1.3,
37.3± 1.9, and 37.4 ± 2.7 g, respectively. There were no significant differences in food intake and body weight among each group, indicating that there were no negative effects of this herb mixture on appetite and body weight in these animals.
Cardiac Function
The measurements of cardiac function were shown in Table 1. The baseline values,
=0.028), and LVSV (P = 0.007) increased significantly. Table 1 showed that, 3.5 h after LPS injection, LPS sig- nificantly reduced diastolic interventricular septum (IVSd) (P < 0.05), systolic interventricular septum (IVSs) (P < 0.01), left ventricular dimension fraction shortening (LVDFS) (P < 0.01), LVEF (P < 0.05), and increased LVDs (P < 0.05), LVESV (P < 0.05). The GD mixture partially reversed LVDFS and LVEF but did not alter the deleterious effects of LPS on decreasing IVSd, IVSs, LVDs, and LVESV.
Cardioprotective Effects of Ginseng and Danshen Mixture |
123 |
Table 1.
|
|
|
|
Before GD Supplement |
|
|
|
|
|
After LPS Injection |
|
|
|||||
|
|
Control |
LPS |
|
GD+LPS |
Control |
LPS |
GD+LPS |
|||||||||
|
IVSd (mm) |
1.54 |
± |
0.05 |
1.44 |
± |
0.04 |
1.71 |
± |
0.20 |
1.84 |
± |
0.11 |
1.59 |
± 0.05* |
1.57 |
± 0.05* |
|
IVSs (mm) |
2.66 |
± |
0.07 |
2.61 |
± |
0.06 |
2.81 |
± |
0.20 |
3.16 |
± |
0.16 |
2.55 |
± 0.07** |
2.50 |
± 0.14** |
|
LVDd (mm) |
6.48 |
± |
0.19 |
6.70 |
± |
0.12 |
6.49 |
± |
0.18 |
6.81 |
± |
0.20 |
6.90 |
± 0.15 |
7.13 |
± 0.17 |
|
LVDs (mm) |
3.21 |
± |
0.11 |
3.21 |
± |
0.18 |
3.21 |
± |
0.11 |
3.14 |
± |
0.24 |
3.90 |
± 0.13* |
3.86 |
± 0.24* |
|
LVPWd (mm) |
1.84 |
± |
0.10 |
1.76 |
± |
0.07 |
1.80 |
± |
0.14 |
1.76 |
± |
0.08 |
1.82 |
± 0.05 |
1.87 |
± 0.05 |
|
LVPWs (mm) |
2.94 |
± |
0.10 |
2.98 |
± |
0.14 |
2.80 |
± |
0.13 |
3.09 |
± |
0.08 |
3.00 |
± 0.12 |
3.04 |
± 0.07 |
|
LVEDV (ml) |
0.64 |
± |
0.04 |
0.69 |
± |
0.04 |
0.63 |
± |
0.06 |
0.74 |
± |
0.06 |
0.77 |
± 0.04 |
0.81 |
± 0.06 |
|
LVESV (ml) |
0.10 |
± |
0.01 |
0.11 |
± |
0.01 |
0.10 |
± |
0.01 |
0.09 |
± |
0.02 |
0.15 |
± 0.01 |
0.16 |
± 0.03* |
|
IVSFT (%) |
72.67 |
± |
6.06 |
83.28 |
± |
4.77 |
68.49 |
± |
6.24 |
77.75 |
± 13.53 |
60.62 |
± 5.41 |
60.96 |
± 7.62 |
|
LVDFS (%) |
50.37 |
± |
1.32 |
51.90 |
± |
2.54 |
50.36 |
± |
1.42 |
55.40 |
± |
3.22 |
43.69 |
± 2.14** |
45.88 |
± 2.65** |
|
|
LVPWFS(%) |
65.61 |
± |
8.41 |
74.12 |
± |
8.70 |
66.34 |
± 11.28 |
75.98 |
± |
5.65 |
64.75 |
± 8.07 |
65.78 |
± 5.25 |
|
LVSV (ml) |
0.53 |
± |
0.04 |
0.59 |
± |
0.09 |
0.54 |
± |
0.11 |
0.64 |
± |
0.05 |
0.61 |
± 0.05 |
0.66 |
± 0.04 |
|
LVEF (%) |
85.97 |
± |
1.07 |
86.62 ± |
1.75 |
85.93 |
± |
1.15 |
87.97 |
± |
2.15 |
79.50 |
± 2.13* |
81.45 |
± 2.23 |
Complete
A
Change in Stroke Volume (%)
40
30
20
10
0
B
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
(%) |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fraction |
2 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ejectionin |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
Control |
LPS |
GD+LPS |
|
|
*
**
Fig. 2. Effects of GD supplementation on
also showed similar protective effects as the changes in LVSV. LPS injection resulted in a significant decrease in LVEF
Inflammation Markers
124
A
|
6000 |
Control (n = 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
5000 |
LPS (n = 8) |
|
|
|
(pg/ml)IL6 |
GD+LPS (n = 8) |
|
|
||
3000 |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
||
|
4000 |
|
|
|
|
Plasma |
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
Baseline |
0 |
2 |
4 |
|
|
Time (h)
Tsai, Chuang, Lin, Chen, Chen and Liao
B
LPS |
300 |
Control (n = 8) |
* |
|
to |
250 |
LPS (n = 8) |
|
|
GD+LPS (n = 8) |
|
|||
IL6 |
200 |
|
|
|
of |
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
+ |
|
|
Responsiveness |
|
* * |
||
100 |
|
* |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
|
|
Time (h)
C 100 |
2D Graph 1 |
|
||
|
|
r = |
||
|
95 |
|
|
|
(%) |
|
|
p = 0.012 |
|
|
|
|
||
90 |
|
|
|
|
Fraction |
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ejection |
80 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
65 |
2000 |
4000 |
6000 |
|
0 |
Plasma IL6 (pg/ml)
Fig. 3. Effect of supplement on
=
A 5000
(pg/ml)α |
4000 |
|
|
Plasma TNF |
3000 |
2000 |
|
|
0 |
B 100
Control (n = 8) |
|
LPS |
|
|
LPS (n = 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GD+LPS (n = 8) |
|
TNFα to |
80 |
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
|
|
Responsiveness |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
Baseline |
0 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
Time (h)
Control (n = 8) |
|
LPS (n = 8) |
* |
GD+LPS (n = 8) |
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
2 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
Time(h) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fig. 4. Effect of supplement on
challenge had significantly lower in GD+LPS group than LPS group (LPS: +220 folds vs. GD+LPS: +101 folds; P < 0.05; Fig. 3B). Moreover, there was a significant negative relationship between circulating
hafter LPS challenge (r =
The trend of responses of circulating
Protein Concentration and Expression of GAPDH
We performed the protein assay to certify the protein amount in equal weight of each sample to check whether LPS can result in proteolysis. The results showed in Fig. 5. The average protein contents were 0.96 mg in 50 mg left ventricular tissue. LPS resulted protein content loss to 0.71 mg, and GD+LPS maintain protein content at 1.0 mg. However, there were no significant differences among three groups (Fig. 5A). Following equal loading of protein performed in Western blot, the expression of GAPDH decreased by ~28% in LPS and by ~22% in GD+LPS after LPS challenge compared to Control group, but no significance was found among three group (Fig. 5B).
Discussion
To test whether a novel GD mixture consisting of Panax ginseng and Salvia miltiorrhiza bunge has myocardium protective effects after
Cardioprotective Effects of Ginseng and Danshen Mixture |
125 |
A1.2
|
1.0 |
|
LV |
0.8 |
|
mg |
||
|
||
mg Protein/50 |
0.6 |
|
0.4 |
||
0.2 |
||
|
||
|
0.0 |
|
Control |
LPS |
GD+LPS |
B |
C |
LPS |
GD+LPS |
|
LPS |
|
|
|
Supplement |
|
|
|
GAPDH |
|
|
|
(37 kDa) |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
107) |
1.2 |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
× |
|
|
|
GAPDH (DensitometricSignal |
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
Control |
LPS |
GD+LPS |
Fig. 5. Effect of supplement on
(A)and GAPDH expression (B). The left ventricular tissue (50 mg) was homogenized, and the supernatant was performed for protein assay. The equal protein was loaded and performed in Western blot, including revers- ible Ponceau S. staining prior to blot with
supplementation, we administered LPS intraperito- neally to determine the acute changes in myocar- dial functions and underlying mechanisms for the possible benefits. The primary findings of the present study are that
These findings provide evidence that the GD mixture attenuated this acute
LPS has strong deleterious effects on triggering systemic inflammation and impairing cellular functions in many organs, e.g. heart (3, 6, 12, 13, 33). More- over, LPS at doses of
The most striking findings are that
Acute inflammation involving macrophage activation is critical to immune defense under various external and internal pathogens in the organism (28). The most frequently seen external pathogen, LPS, triggers the plentiful release of several
126 |
Tsai, Chuang, Lin, Chen, Chen and Liao |
systolic dysfunction even in the absence of the clinical syndrome of chronic heart failure (29, 34), suggesting
Although the circulating levels of
4
A number of recent publications highlighted the action of LPS for inducing intracellular protein oxidative damage and proteolysis (7, 18, 23). Mehlhase et al. (2000) demonstrated that the involvement of oxidative stress in the increased proteolysis and upregulation of proteasomal system in
Here we only observed that LPS resulted in a slight decrease in total intracellular protein amount (decreased by ~26%) and GAPDH expression (decreased by ~28%) in left ventricular myocardium (Figs. 5, A and B). The GD mixture showed a slight but not significant ef- fect on preserving total cellular protein levels (total
protein decreased by 4%; GADPH decreased by ~22%). The discrepancy between our and previous findings is probably due to different experimental models, doses and durations of LPS treatment. Presumably, the LPS dose and treatment duration in this study (0.5 mg/kg for 4 h) was relatively lower than those previous reports (7, 23). Therefore, the benefits of the GD mixture on suppressing
In summary, we demonstrate that
Acknowledgments
This work was partly supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, ROC.
Reference
1.Akira, S., Taga, T. and Kishimoto, T.
2.Balija, T.M. and Lowry, S.F. Lipopolysaccharide and
3.
4.Cadenas, S. and Cadenas, A.M. Fighting the
5.Committee, N.P. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China. Part 1:
6.Danner, R.L., Elin, R.J., Hosseini, J.M., Wesley, R.A., Reilly, J.M. and Parillo, J.E.. Endotoxemia in human septic shock. Chest 99:
Cardioprotective Effects of Ginseng and Danshen Mixture |
127 |
7.Dehoux, M.J., van Beneden, R.P.,
8.Flierl, M.A., Rittirsch, D.,
9.Friedenauer, S. and Berlet, H.H. Sensitivity and variability of the Bradford protein assay in the presence of detergents. Anal. Bio- chem. 178:
10.Gardiner, P., Graham, R., Legedza, A.T., Ahn, A.C, Eisenberg, D.M. and Phillips, R.S. Factors associated with herbal therapy use by adults in the United States. Altern. Ther. Health Med. 13:
11.Ge, G., Zhang, Q., Ma, J., Qiao, Z., Huang, J., Cheng, W. and Wang, H. Protective effect of Salvia Miltiorrhiza aqueous extract on myo- cardium oxidative injury in
12.
13.Grune, T., Reinheckel, T. and Davies, K.J. Degradation of oxidized proteins in mammalian cells. FASEB J. 11:
14.Hu, P., Luo,
15.Jeon, S.J., Son, K.H., Kim, Y.S., Choi, Y.H. and Kim, H.P. Inhibi- tion of prostaglandin and nitric oxide production in lipopolysac-
16.Kielian, T.L. and Blecha, F. CD14 and other recognition molecules for lipopolysaccharide: a review. Immunopharmacology 29: 187- 205, 1995.
17.Kim, S., Oh, M.H., Kim, B.S., Kim, W.I., Cho, H.S., Park, B.Y., Park, C., Shin, G.W. and Kwon, J. Upregulation of heme
18.Lee, K.W., Jung, S.Y., Choi, S.M. and Yang, E.J. Effects of ginse- noside Re on
19.Lin, J.W., Cherng, Y.G., Chen, L.J., Niu, H.S., Chang, C.K. and Niu, C.S. Ginseng is useful to enhance cardiac contractility in ani- mals. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014: 723084, 2014.
20.Maeder, M., Fehr, T., Rickli, H. and Ammann, P.
21.Mallis, R.J., Buss, J.E. and Thomas, J.A. Oxidative modification of
22.McDonald, T.E., Grinman, M.N., Carthy, C.M. and Walley, K.R. Endotoxin infusion in rats induces apoptotic and survival pathways in hearts. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 279:
23.Mehlhase, J., Gieche, J., Ullrich, O., Sitte, N. and Grune, T. LPS- induced protein oxidation and proteolysis in
24.Meldrum, D.R. Tumor necrosis factor in the heart. Am. J. Physiol. 274:
25.Ng, T.B., Liu, F. and Wang, Z.T. Antioxidative activity of natural products from plants. Life Sci. 66:
26.Parrillo, J.E., Parker, M.M., Natanson, C., Suffredini, A.F., Danner, R.L., Cunnion, R.E. and Ognibene, F.P. Septic shock in humans.
Advances in the understanding of pathogenesis, cardiovascular dysfunction, and therapy. Ann. Intern. Med. 113:
27.Quinones, M.A., Waggoner, A.D., Reduto, L.A., Nelson, J.G., Young, J.B., Winters, W.L., Jr., Ribeiro, L.G. and Miller, R.R. A new, simplified and accurate method for determining ejection fraction with
28.Ran, S. and Montgomery, K.E.
29.Raymond, R.J., Dehmer, G.J., Theoharides, T.C. and Deliargyris, E.N. Elevated
30.Rosecrans, R. and Dohnal, J.C. The effect of complimentary and alternative medicine products on laboratory testing. Semin. Diagn. Pathol. 26:
31.Sahn, D.J., DeMaria, A., Kisslo, J. and Weyman, A. Recommendations regarding quantitation in
32.Song, M., Huang, L., Zhao, G. and Song, Y. Beneficial effects of a polysaccharide from Salvia miltiorrhiza on myocardial ischemia- reperfusion injury in rats. Carbohydr. Polym. 98:
33.Suffredini, A.F., Fromm, R.E., Parker, M.M., Brenner, M., Kovacs, J.A., Wesley, R.A. and Parrillo, J.E.. The cardiovascular response of normal humans to the administration of endotoxin. N. Engl. J. Med. 321:
34.
27:
35.Varjas, T., Nowrasteh, G., Budan, F., Nadasi, E., Horvath, G., Makai, S., Gracza, T., Cseh, J. and Ember, I. Chemopreventive effect of Panax ginseng. Phytother. Res: PTR 23:
36.Wang, J., Li, S., Fan, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, D., Cheng, H., Gao, X. and Zhou, Y.
37.Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Guo, L.L., Wu, G.J. and Liu, R.H. Salvianolic acid B inhibits the
38.Wei, N., Zhang, C., He, H., Wang, T., Liu, Z., Liu, G., Sun, Z., Zhou, Z., Bai, C. and Yuan, D. Protective effect of saponins extract from Panax japonicus on myocardial infarction: involvement of
66:
39.Yuan, Q., Jiang, Y.W., Ma, T.T., Fang, Q.H. and Pan, L. Attenuating effect of Ginsenoside Rb1 on
40.Zhang, T., Yan, T., Du, J., Wang, S. and Yang, H. Apigenin attenuates heart injury in
41.Zhou, L., Zuo, Z. and Chow, M.S. Danshen: an overview of its chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical use. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 45:
42.Zila, I., Mokra, D., Kopincova, J., Kolomaznik, M., Javorka, M. and Calkovska, A. Heart rate variability and inflammatory response in rats with
43.Zimmerman, J.J. Defining the role of oxyradicals in the pathogen- esis of sepsis. Crit. Care Med. 23: